Sincelast December , the humanity of corpuscle physics has been awash with hypothesis about the nature of a likely raw molecule that   might have been seen in the CERN collisions .

Although CERN film director Fabiola Gianotti stated that there ’s noscheduled announcement , theoretical physicists have been producing many dissimilar explanations to explain December ’s gibbosity in the data .

Among them , a Korean - American collaboration suggests a very different advance . In a paper , published inPhysical Review Letters , the investigator excuse that instead of make a speck at that specific tidy sum , it is potential that a serial of particles – a shower – could bring forth a similarly observed theme song .

The CERN announcement hash out   the detection of an excess at 750 GeV ( the mass of about 800 proton ) , although they did n’t have enough certainty in the effect to corroborate a uncovering .

“ This was a very surprising announcement and a puzzler at the same clip , because the lifetime and mass of the molecule could reveal something else beyond simply one extra particle , if it sour out to be a genuine sign , ” enunciate co - author Kyoungchul Kong , associate professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Kansas , in astatement .   “ Yet we do not claim this as a uncovering , and we demand more data . ”

Although the cathartic is very complex , there ’s a simple reason why physicist are   excited about the 750 GeV excess . If it turns out to be a new particle , it would be the first one not predicted by the Standard Model , which is the most complete possibility of particle natural philosophy we currently have . It would herald a Modern earned run average of natural philosophy .

CERN will provide an update on the 750 GeV redundant next week at theInternational Conference on High Energy Physicsin Chicago . Four years ago , CERN select the same conference to announce the discovery of the Higgs Boson .

“ Theorists propose ideas , and experimentalists do experiments to test the idea , then publish their result – and we attempt to interpret , ” Kong impart .   “ We explore musical theme . belike most of the ideas are wrong – but we determine from them , and we suggest good ideas . ”