It comes as no surprise that the steering reckoner aboard the Apollo 11 space vehicle were impossibly rude compare to the pocket computing gadget we all carry around 50 years later . Buton his internet site , an Apple developeranalyzed the tech specseven further and found that even something as unsubdivided as a modern USB charger is packed with more processing power .
Forrest Heller , a software developer who formerly work on Occipital’sStructure 3-D scanner accessoryfor mobile equipment , but who now work for Apple , broke down the numberswhen it comes to the processing power , memory , and storage electrical capacity of Google ’s 18W Pixel charger , Huawei ’s 40W SuperCharge , the Anker PowerPort Atom PD 2 charger , and the Apollo 11 counseling calculator , also concern to as the AGC .
https://gizmodo.com/it-would-take-this-50-year-old-nasa-computer-more-than-1836216049

Photo: (Wikimedia) / Photo: (Wikimedia) / Photo: (Anker)
It ’s not easygoing to directly compare those innovative devices with the 50 - twelvemonth - old AGC , which was usance developed by NASA for hold and automatise the guidance and seafaring systems aboard the Apollo 11 spacecraft . In a clip when computers were the size of giant rooms , the AGC was turn back in a box just a few feet in length because it was one of the first computers to be made with integrated circuit . or else of plopping in an off the shelf processor , NASA ’s engineers project and built the AGC with somewhere around 5,600 electronic gates that were capable of performing nearly 40,000 dim-witted numerical calculations every moment . While we measure processor speeds in GHz these days , the AGC chug along at 1.024 MHz .
By compare , the Anker PowerPort Atom PD 2 USB - coulomb charger includes a Cypress CYPD4225 processor running at 48 Mc with the twice the RAM of the AGC , and almost twice the store outer space for software system instructions . There would be some challenge when it comes to take all of the software powering the Apollo 11 ballistic capsule employment on modern equipment , but on his site , Heller position out the case for why he believe that just four of Anker ’s USB chargers could have potentially help oneself take spaceman to the moon and back .
However , going to blank is not precisely a smooth ride . A rocket blasting off the pad is a much different experience to flooring the gas pedal in a finely tuned play car . Astronauts , and the equipment that accept them to space , were not only subject to intense G - force ( Apollo 11 ’s top speed was over 24,000 Swedish mile per hour as it revolve the Earth before head to the moon ) but leaving Earth ’s orbital cavity also let on them to radiation and other challenge not experienced back on the land . In other Book , while a New USB courser might have more processing power than Apollo 11 ’s direction electronic computer , it ’s dubious they could survive that trip .

AnkerNASA
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , science , and polish news in your inbox daily .
news program from the hereafter , delivered to your present .
Please select your desire newssheet and submit your email to elevate your inbox .

You May Also Like













![]()