Just when you think you ’ve uncovered all the possible case of unethical human experiment ever done , history throws a new wrinkle at you . In the early seventies , a parturition control clinic in San Antonio gave indigent women fake birth control as part of a aesculapian study .
There are probably about ten people walk around today exclusively because of a grossly unethical experiment . If you ’re inquire whether you ’re one of them , ask yourself if you were born in San Antonio in belated 1971 or early 1972 . During 1971 , a San Antonio birth control clinic engaged in an experimentation designed to canvas the side effects of an oral contraceptive . The clinic did this by doing a double - unreasoning test , during which they gave one-half of a grouping of female patients real contraceptives , and one-half of them placebos . Half way through the study , they switch group . They then monitored the woman ’s symptom – other than sudden , unexplained pregnancy .
Few women are willing to take a gamble on whether or not their birth ascendance is go to be placebo , and even few charwoman were willing to do that before Roe v Wade . The clinic catch “ Tennessean ” because no one inform the women that they ’d be bewilder a placebo . The fair sex were told that they want to habituate vaginal ointment for nativity control , but as many of the them were impoverished , and all of them were under the imprint that they would already be on parentage ascendence , there ’s no style to have intercourse how many were compliant . Of 76 subjects , ten became pregnant while on the placebo , and one got pregnant while on the genuine nativity control .

[ ViaA Placebo - Controlled Double - Blind Crossover Study , Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research , Research Compliance . ]
Birth controlMedicineScience
Daily Newsletter
Get the full tech , science , and finish news in your inbox daily .
news program from the futurity , render to your present tense .
You May Also Like













![]()
